For Christmas I got a fascinating present from a buddy - my very own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was completely written by AI, with a couple of basic triggers about me provided by my buddy Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of composing, bphomesteading.com but it's likewise a bit recurring, and very verbose. It may have surpassed Janet's triggers in looking at information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mystical, repeated hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had sold around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, given that pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based upon an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, gdprhub.eu who developed it, can purchase any further copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody creating one in anybody's name, including stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, created by AI, and designed "entirely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is intended as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get offered further.

He intends to expand his variety, creating different genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps using an autobiography service. It's to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - selling AI-generated goods to human clients.

It's likewise a bit frightening if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we actually mean human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is pictures. It's artworks. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, photorum.eclat-mauve.fr it was still extremely popular.

"I do not think making use of generative AI for creative purposes must be prohibited, however I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without consent must be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very effective but let's build it ethically and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have selected to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have actually decided to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to use developers' material on the internet to assist establish their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He mentions that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is likewise highly against removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a lot of delight," states the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening one of its finest performing markets on the vague pledge of growth."

A government representative stated: "No relocation will be made until we are definitely positive we have a useful plan that delivers each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to help them license their content, access to high-quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI plan, a national data library including public information from a vast array of sources will likewise be provided to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the security of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector needed to share information of the operations of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a number of lawsuits versus AI firms, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their permission, and setiathome.berkeley.edu used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of factors which can make up reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it collects training information and whether it must be spending for it.

If this wasn't all enough to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It became the many downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its innovation for a portion of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I truly want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It has plenty of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be rather challenging to read in parts since it's so verbose.

But given how rapidly the tech is progressing, I'm not exactly sure how long I can remain positive that my considerably slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in international innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters around the globe.

Outside the UK? Register here.